Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
On 2004-07-23 08:47:42 +0100 Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org> wrote:
To be fair, there are two people arguing against the QPL being
non-free.
I think there are more than that, but not all are helping to move
things forward. ;-) In any case, it doesn't matter at this point what
the numbers are. If their argument explains why a QPL-covered work
follows DFSG and that isn't affected by the discussed problems, I hope
most of us are humble enough to correct ourselves.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
Reply to: