[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Summary : ocaml, QPL and the DFSG.



>
>   #index top up prev next
>     _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>   [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
>
>                                                           Re: Summary : ocaml, QPL and the DFSG.
>     _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>     * To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
>     * Subject: Re: Summary : ocaml, QPL and the DFSG.
>     * From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
>     * Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:46:32 -0400
>     * In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040721211139.GD5404@squee.verizon.net> (David Nusinow'smessage of "Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:11:39 -0400")
>     * Message-id: <[🔎] 87y8ld567r.fsf@aule.evenmere.org>
>     * Old-return-path: <bts@alum.mit.edu>
>     * References: <[🔎] E1BmuCa-0005Zp-00@sledge.mossbank.org.uk><[🔎] 20040720231951.GH30967@hezmatt.org><[🔎] 20040720231951.GH30967@hezmatt.org>
>       <[🔎] 20040721001404.GZ667@zewt.org><[🔎] E1BnDrz-0004zF-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk><[🔎] 20040721152125.GB32318@hezmatt.org><20040721162037.GB5404@squee.verizo
>       n.net><[🔎] 20040721163646.GE32318@hezmatt.org><[🔎] 20040721180247.GC5404@squee.verizon.net><[🔎] 87llhd6tzv.fsf@aule.evenmere.org><20040721211139.GD5404@sque
>       e.verizon.net>
>     * User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
>     _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net> writes:
>
>>> Additionally, I cannot conceive of any way of doing this in a free way
>>> -- even if forced distribution to upstream on distribution of
>>> modifications is accepted as free.  Can I say that you must send me
>>> modifications to the software I write every time you distribute?  So
>>> on every download, fling another one my way?  Can I say you must send
>>> them addressed to me at Sven Luther's address?
>>
>> I don't see any conflict with either of these questions and the DFSG.
>
>Great.  Please suggest an example free license with a forced upstream
>distribution clause.  It may be a copyleft or not, at your choice.

Brian, i ask you to not use again my name in your post, nor to participate in
this thread about this. I will consider any conclusion you have participated
in as void and not binding, as you are obviously clueless, and you vested
interest in producing proprietary versions of the ocaml compiler suite clearly
makes your participation here suspect and your intent to delay the real work
by muddying the water is not welcome.

Please go and modify your scheme compiler, and stop bothering everyone here,
and in particular stop using my name for it.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: