Re: Re: Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:16:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> No response yet to my reasonable thread, i wonder if it was the good way to
> go finally.
I'll speak up and say that your new thread appears to be fairly inclusive of
several points of concern in the QPL.
I imagine that nobody has responded yet (at least in part) because reasoned
arguments take time to address an appropriately reasoned reply. It's much
easier and quicker to respond to knee-jerk reactions.
I, for one, am planning on responding to your summary with my arguments.
Please do not take an hour or two of silence as being either (a) consensus,
or (b) wilful dismissal.