Re: Re: Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 12:42:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> IIRC, neither of us could find a log of this incident, so can you
> please stop referring to it? Seeing as you wrote you had "no time for
Because i don't keep irc logs, doesn't mean it didn't happen, and i am sure
others keep log and can provide the info. And Branden is a promeninent
debian-legal poster, so what do you expect of me ?
> this" when I suggested you deal with it on -project back in March, I
Err, i said i had no time to follow on more mailing lists, this counts for
both -project and -legal BTW.
> think we should not excuse you any longer. This is one DD's word
> against another and not particularly interesting any more. If you
> won't fix it, stop whining.
Sure, whatever, you only protect the bullies this way.
> >And notice that kind posts doesn't bring replies nor attract
> >attention, as i
> >have noticed.
>
> The attention stupid posts get is not good attention.
Thanks. This means all my first posts where stupid. I wonder why so many
others receive attention then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: