Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>* It singles out a particular package, which I believe will raise _more_ >>accusations of vigilante license analysis, not less. >> >>* Analyzing the license with a particular package in mind may cause a >>summary to only be valid for one particular package. *License* > > A particular exception to this is where a copyright holder holds an > interpretation that does not sanely follow from the license, in which > case the summary really is tied to that instance. Pine before its > relicensing is an obvious example of this. Agreed entirely. That falls under "clarifications", though. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature