MJ Ray wrote: > Having a fairly short summary that references another one doesn't seem > like a bad thing. Hopefully they'll be common. That's exactly what I had in mind; a license summary, and if necesary, package summaries that reference the relevant license summary and add anything specific to the given package. > Thanks for your thoughts. Sorry I don't agree any more with using this > list for any more abstract analyses of licences than necessary. I certainly don't think we should analyze licenses without being prompted by a particular package. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature