Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed
> The reference offered as showing that SGI B is considered non-free only
> showed one post to me, not a discussion.
I think I also referenced Bug #211765, where the license is described as
non-free, and a longer discussion is referenced:
Regarding the Nokia license, the maintainer asking the question
seemed to conclude the license was non-free:
"Thanks for everyone's opinion. The consensus is that this license is not
compatible with the DFSG."
> Would Jim Marhaus or someone who knows him please introduce him to us?
I'm just a Debian user, been reading debian-legal off and on for a few years.
Thanks for continuing this discussion,