Re: libkrb53 - odd license term
On 2004-06-05 00:23:18 +0100 Glenn Maynard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
it's up to the list to determine if there's a problem. Sorry, but I'm
not willing to ignore the DFSG so long as I don't use a particular
No-one is ignoring the DFSG, so I don't know why you mentioned that.
software, and I think it's the burden of people who actually care
the software to do the legwork to ensure that it's free.
Sure, but I can't see why they shouldn't assert their (non-exclusive)
copyright interest in derived works.
There's also not yet a consensus on the "agree to the following terms
do not retrieve" clause [...]
No, that's interesting too.
My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Help hack the EuroParl! http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/eurovote/