On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 07:21:56PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which > covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is > free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and > may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from > all the blah, blah. The most interessting part is on the bottom of the > text. > > Permission to Reprint IBM Copyrighted Publications <snip> Unless I'm misrememebring, this is IBM's stock non-free license for softcopy documentation (it's actually a pretty good license, as proprietary ones go). It was probably rubber-stamped on. If you ask the relevant people then they might (eventually) give you a free license. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature