[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sendmail X license (fwd)

Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Um, I'm not a lawyer and this is outside even my
> layman's-understanding of the law, but I'm certain I've seen cases
> proceed in the courts of location X under the laws of location Y,
> because a violation of a contract happened in X -- or the parties or
> tort are somehow in X, such that it has jurisdiction, but the contract
> insists on the laws of Y.
> So this doesn't force it to happen in a particular place, it just
> encourages the courts to virtualize their judges.

Do you have a citation?  I don't see how this could possibly work.  I
could see that a tort happens in place X that is decided in a court in
place Y, but I don't see how you're going to get courts in one place
to familiarize themselves with the laws of another place.  The law is
complicated enough just worrying about one place.

Walter Landry

Reply to: