[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

> Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:
> > Here's where you start running into problems: GPL#2 requires you satisfy
> > GPL#1 for the modified work, which now includes stuff you do not have
> > the right to put under GPL's terms.

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:22:11PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> No, it says I may only *distribute* it under such a license.

Section 1 says "You may copy and distribute..."

> > What are the appropriate license notices you've placed?  How do they
> > satisfy the GPL requirements about the license on the work as a whole?

> "This is private work by Alyssa P. Hacker.  No distribution is
> intended and no license is granted to any third party" -- after all,
> it's my personal copy and I really will never distribute it.

This doesn't allow you to make copies of the GPL'd elements.


Reply to: