[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL

@ 11/05/2004 20:55 : wrote Raul Miller :

Of course for copyright purposes it might be reasonable to say that the
painting and the notice together are contained in the work.
Similarly, I could hand you a book and tell you that I license to you
all my rights in that book under the terms of the GPL, and the GPL
would apply.

And if you lied?

Or changed your mind?

Or if I lied?

How could a judge know that I wasn't lying when I tell him you said it
was a GPLed work?
google: "estoppel"


Reply to: