Re: GFDL
Glenn Maynard said on Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:38:56PM -0400,:
> He modifies the existing essay to express his own opinion, renames
> it and makes it clear that it's his opinion and not that of the
> FSF, and releases it. You then read it, and get a different idea
> of freedom.
>
> I don't think this is a problem.
GFDL requires change of title of a modified document. And also
addition of names of authors of the modifications.
> it seems like an attempt, through licensing, to prevent people from
> expressing competing philosophies. That goal feels extremely
> non-free.
1. GFDL does not prevent what you think it prevents.
2. In preventing people from doing certain things, GFDL works in the
same way almost all copyleft licenses (like the GPL) do.
--
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M.,
'NANDINI', S. R. M. Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin-682018,
Kerala, India.
http://paivakil.port5.com
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GFDL
- From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
- Re: GFDL
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- References:
- Re: GFDL
- From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil@vsnl.net>
- Re: GFDL
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: GFDL
- From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil@vsnl.net>
- Re: GFDL
- From: Glenn Maynard <g_deb@zewt.org>