Re: CCPL-by

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: djpig@debian.org
Subject: Re: CCPL-by
From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:06:38 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u105swvl.fsf@wasp.nowan.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, djpig@debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040330123559.GB1153@djpig.de> (Frank Lichtenheld's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:35:59 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 20040324215356.6d43e3d4.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] c3t3s7$vac$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 87u10cyecq.fsf@wasp.nowan.org> <[🔎] 406481C1.9040905@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] 20040330123559.GB1153@djpig.de>

Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> writes:

> Has anyone cared to check the source code of the page?
> This sections begins with a comment:
> <!-- BREAKOUT FOR CC NOTICE.  NOT A PART OF THE LICENSE -->
>
> So please just ask CC if they could make this fact more obvious (i.e.
> not just using different backgroudn colors).

Ah!  Then that can probably be resolved, but I do think it merits
explicit clarification by CC.

-- 
Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333  9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03

Reply to:

References:
- CCPL-by
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Re: CCPL-by
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: CCPL-by
  - From: Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>
- Re: CCPL-by
  - From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Re: CCPL-by
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>

Prev by Date: RE: POSSIVEL SPAM-- Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
Next by Date: Re: Re: CCPL-by
Previous by thread: Re: CCPL-by
Next by thread: Re: Re: CCPL-by
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread