Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License
- To: selussos <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License
- From: MJ Ray <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:41:30 +0000
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <07bb01c404b8$af52cfb0$2a05a8c0@Persephone>
On 2004-03-08 02:46:15 +0000 selussos <email@example.com> wrote:
I am not in the United States. Copyright law here has no "fair use"
it, only a restricted "fair dealing" provision. We cannot rely on
copyright law's "fair use" contradicting your licence terms in a way
makes it a free software licence. I ask that you familiarise
this basic problem of copyright and free software. Software that is
only for US residents" isn't free software (or "open source" AIUI).
I am unaware of what AIUI means so I cannot comment on this at all.
That's parenthetical, so hardly enough to prevent a comment on the
substantial part: you cannot rely on US "fair use" doctrine combining
with your licence to make it free software.
From Virtual Entity of Relevant Acronyms (Version 1.9, June 2002) :
As I Understand It (telecommunication-slang, Usenet, IRC)
I suggest http://www.dict.org/ as a handy tool.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/