Re: Summary: Is Open Publication License v1.0 compatible?, was Re: GPL+ for docs
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:00:44AM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> Simon Law <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:08:29PM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> >> Here's a summary, since it doesn't seem like anyone has anything more
> >> to say on the subject:
> > Hmm... I hate to seem authoritarian, but I'd like to see a little
> > more formality in d-l summaries.
> I think we should take it on a case-by-case basis. For many cases, I'm
> afraid, this would simply end up taking up most of our time following
> the forms of producing summaries. My judgement was that there is no
> real controversy on this issue, so I went ahead and posted a simple
Hmmm.... I think I'll set up a webpage containing our license
summaries over the weekend.