[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Cypherpunks anti-License

Thanks for your analysis, Anthony.

>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:

Anthony> On Feb 24, 2004, at 16:02, Hubert Chan wrote:
Hubert> [1] http://www.cypherspace.org/CPL

Anthony> Please paste license texts inline.

OK.  Will do that in the future.


CPL> Non Litigation ...


Anthony> If Debian wishes to make this promise, then it is free to do so
Anthony> as well; I'm not sure if we do. However, if we don't, then just
Anthony> delete this paragraph.

Well, I certainly wouldn't want to make that decision on behalf of
Debian. ;-)

If I wish to delete this paragraph, what is the best way to do this?
Should I say in the copyright file something to the effect of, "the
original hashcash package is released under the CPL, which is available
From ..., but the Debian package is released under a modified CPL"?  Or
"but the Debian package is in the public domain, as allowed by the CPL"?

(I know that the CPL allows me to relicense without any notice.  But I
want to be as un-rude as possible.)


(again, please CC me on replies.)

Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Attachment: pgpe4LKMUDYQt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: