Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:21:49PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2004, at 08:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
> >Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >>If the .el source files use copyrightable material from emacs, be it
> >>copyrightable APIs,
> >Since when is an API protected by copyright? And where?
> Finally found it again!
How does this relate to (override, narrow, whatever) the
precedent set by Lotus vs. Borland (the famous case about
Quattro Pro reproducing the "Look and Feel" of Lotus-1-2-3,
partially because it was also the Lotus-1-2-3 macro language
Acknowledgement: Lotus, Lotus-1-2-3 and IBM are believed to be a
trademarks of IBM, Borland is believed to be a trademark of
Borland. Quattro Pro is believed to be a trademark once
belonging to Borland, but now possibly transfered to another
This message is hastily written, please ignore any unpleasant wordings,
do not consider it a binding commitment, even if its phrasing may
indicate so. Its contents may be deliberately or accidentally untrue.
Trademarks and other things belong to their owners, if any.