[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "Non-Free GFDL" and correct packaging practices

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:24:13AM +0000, James Troup wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:
> > As a question of principle, I also believe this is the correct
> > practice because of the contract we've made stating that everything
> > in our main archive is covered by the freedoms listed in the DFSG.
> Agreed.

I concur with James and Steve, and would just like to re-emphasize their
point that there is a false dilemma posited in Scott's original message.

G. Branden Robinson                |     The Rehnquist Court has never
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     encountered a criminal statute it
branden@debian.org                 |     did not like.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- John Dean

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: