[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status and futur of ArgoUML package(s)



Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:

> On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 21:29, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
>> I did Cc: debian-legal to have a look at the license but I think it's
>> completly non-free!
>
> Not only non-free, but so bad we couldn't even put it in the non-free
> section.
>
> For example, way down in the third set of terms(!) it has a non-compete
> type clause.

Thanks for your help. ArgoUML project[1] does put this library in their
CVS[2]. Do you think it's legal? I already did warn them[3], Was I wrong
or right?

>> The text is very long, I did not copy it here, but it's on the web
>> site. 
>
> Please always paste license text when posting to -legal. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200309/msg00129.html and followups.

OK, sorry.

Footnotes: 
[1] http://argouml.tigris.org
[2] http://argouml.tigris.org/source/browse/argouml/lib/
[3] http://argouml.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=15168

-- 
  .''`. 
 : :' :rnaud
 `. `'  
   `-    

Attachment: pgpS3BnasVI1W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: