Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: license conflict in Emacs Lisp support?
Don Armstrong <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Don Armstrong <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > As you can see, linking is not the metric used. Only derivation is.
>> Yes, and I say linking isn't a case of derivation. I can easily
>> find any number of people that disagree with RMS about this, so
>> who's right?
> If you or other people claim that linking is not a case of derivation,
> they can advance arguments about it. Your arguments will be taken even
> more seriously by volunteering a reasonable chunk of change to defend
> such an argument in a court of law. I think 1-5M US$ ought to suffice.
Oh yes, I forgot. Whoever has more money is right.