Re: Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ

To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ
From: Romain FRANCOISE <romain@orebokech.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:53:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87n0f4z1wd.fsf@orebokech.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1059038020.1422.89.camel@localhost> (Thomas Hood's message of "24 Jul 2003 11:13:41 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 1059038020.1422.89.camel@localhost>

There's also:

  15. Q: Why are almost all these "dual" licenses dualed with the GNU
      GPL?

      ... QPL is under GNU/Qt ...

It doesn't make much sense, I think the author means something like "Qt
is under GPL/QPL".  :-)

-- 
Romain FRANCOISE <romain@orebokech.com> | When we were kids, we hated
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | things our parents did.

Reply to:

References:
- Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ
Next by Date: Re: mplayer licenses
Previous by thread: Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ
Next by thread: Re: Suggested small improvements to the (already excellent) DFSG FAQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread