Re: removing non-invaraint section from a GFDL doc

[Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com>]

On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:52:17PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

> >Hello debian-legal,
> >
> >Suppose I remove all the non-invariant sections of a GFDL document that
> >have some sections marked invariant.
> >
> >Are the invariant sections still secondary?
> 
> I don't know. More directly, say that a invariant section suddenly 
> becomes non-secondary because of a program's evolution. Then what?

If you have a look at the GFDL, it appears that the intention is that
any content for which that could be the case cannot be secondary anyway.


Cheers,


Nick

-- 
Nick Phillips -- nwp@lemon-computing.com
Contentsofsignaturemaysettleduringshipping.