[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed Apache license & patent/reciprocity issues

On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:57, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> In contrast, this second clause may be considered DFSG-free, I believe.  
> It states that claiming that *this work* infringes your patents causes 
> your patent licenses for *this work* to be terminated.  This is a clause 
> protecting the work's freeness, which *only* applies to people 
> attempting to make the work non-free.

I think I might be able to go along with that one. Would have to
consider it more, but it certainly doesn't smack of non-freeness. Quite
similar to GPL 4...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: