Re: If not GFDL, then what?

[MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>]

On 2003-10-14 13:42:57 +0100 Joe Moore <joemoore@iegrec.org> wrote:

> The GFDL includes the following definition:
> FDL> A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing 
> the
> FDL> Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
> FDL> modifications and/or translated into another language.
>
> The GFDL requires that "Modified Version"s be distributed under the 
> GFDL.
>
> Your aggregate contains the Document.

Thank you for this clarification.  I knew I must have missed 
something.  I would like to see this note about aggregation added to 
the position statement, if you and Manoj are willing.

--
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/