On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 19:07, Branden Robinson wrote: > However, recent events have caused me to wonder if the Powers That Be > within the project might consider that abuse of the urgency field, since > non-DFSG-free code in main isn't considered a release-critical issue by > the release manager, The problem with this argument is, of course, that the code isn't non-free; "it appears that most or all of the System V code fragments we found had previously been placed in the public domain." Sorry, couldn't resist. Damn SCO.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part