Re: GFDL and Anonymity --- another problem?

[Dylan Thurston <dpt@math.harvard.edu>]

On 2003-10-09, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> wrote:
> Several parts of the GFDL (e.g., 4b, 4i) seem to prohibit anonymous 
> modifications to a document. Quoting 4b:
>
> 	List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities
> 	responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified
> 	Version, ....
>
> If this requires an actual name, it seems this might fail the 
> Chinese[1] Dissident Test.

Surely an "entity" is lose enough to include, say, a Chinese Dissident
Collective created on the spot.

Peace,
	Dylan