Re: GFDL and Anonymity --- another problem?
Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> Several parts of the GFDL (e.g., 4b, 4i) seem to prohibit anonymous
> modifications to a document. Quoting 4b:
> List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities
> responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified
> Version, ....
> If this requires an actual name, it seems this might fail the
> Chinese Dissident Test.
> Compare this to GPL 2a:
> You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
> I think "you" can reasonably be interpreted to include pseudonyms,
> thus preserving anonymity, or even not putting any name at all.
A license is valid because there is a known copyright holder that
explicitely said that his work can be distributed under this license.
"0. This License applies to any program or other work which
contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it
may be distributed under the terms of this General Public
So I wonder how it would be possible for a license to be valid with an
anonymous copyright holder.
The copyright holder can be an individual or a group, but in any case
an entity recognized by the law.
Please, take a look a the section "How to Apply These Terms to Your
New Programs" of the GPLv2.
"How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the
greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve
this is to make it free software which everyone can
redistribute and change under these terms.
To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is
safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most
effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file
should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to
where the full notice is found.
one line to give the program's name and an idea of what it does.
Copyright (C) yyyy name of author
Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and
If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice
like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author
Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details
type `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome
to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `show c'
You should also get your employer (if you work as a
programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright
disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample;
alter the names:
Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright
interest in the program `Gnomovision'
(which makes passes at compilers) written
by James Hacker.
signature of Ty Coon, 1 April 1989
Ty Coon, President of Vice"
I would not be surprised if in many countries software with no author
is in fact a proprietary software.
[Funny to see how some people here are more interested in finding new
issues before making any constructive proposal to fix the existing
Not a native english speaker: