[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: snippets

On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 20:43, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:

> That is not my position!  As I hope you would know.  I would never
> close my eyes to a DFSG problem.  All our software must be free:
> modifiable etc.  That is a given.
> The items under discussion are not "software" in the usual sense of
> the term.  They're little bits of history and such, like the imaginary
> sister-cancer-email README file or /usr/share/emacs/21.2/etc/WHY-FREE.

Please, let's not have this debate again! It has been argued to death
and beyond on this list in the various GFDL threads.

I believe there is a rough consensus (though not unamity, obviously)
that Social Contract 1 says that the DFSG applies to everything in main.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: