Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes: > Well, I think this creates a bit of cognitive dissonance. So, > presumably, does Bruce Perens, who has called upon us to kick non-free > to the curb. > > I mean, come on. We expect people to intuitively understand > "distribution" as something other than "that which gets distributed"? Yes, I agree this is a problem. I think the best way is to drop non-free.