Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)

To: tb@becket.net
Cc: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:21:12 -0400
Message-id: <1B60C396-F362-11D7-95ED-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
In-reply-to: <87ekxzqdw3.fsf@becket.becket.net>

On Monday, Sep 29, 2003, at 21:11 US/Eastern, Thomas Bushnell, BSGwrote:

Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:

That could of been forged.


Note to self: when forging Anthony DeRobertis, spell it "could of".

Damn it, he's caught on to my anti-forgery tricks! Now I'll have to geta new one invented up.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)

Prev by Date: Re: begging the question
Next by Date: Re: PennMUSH license concerns.
Previous by thread: Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Next by thread: Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem (dadadodo at work?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread