On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 15:22, Branden Robinson wrote: > Interesting. Do you think this may be an intended consequence? I have no reason to believe so. Hopefully in a day or two, RMS will clarify (to me at least). > It would certainly serve to discourage forking. I hope RMS realizes that egcs was certainly a good thing, and doesn't try to (legally) prevent forking in the future.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part