Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org> a tapoté :
> On Sunday, Sep 21, 2003, at 03:20 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > But is the upstream author of these *Bugs*. Does it means that Debian
> > have an implicit policy which is "making non-free software is ok
> > unless you distribute it"?
> I'm not sure what your asking, but I think it'd be safe to say Debian
> strongly believes in the right to private modifications.
And do you consider the official logo as a private modification?
Not a native english speaker: