[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal



On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:15:24PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2003 18:47, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > And you are sure that this phrase is part of an Invariant section?
> > And you are sure that this phrase is part of an Invariant section?
> 
> Mathieu, are you too lazy to find by yourself that both sentences appear in 
> the "Distribution" section of the GNU Emacs Manual, which is an Invariant 
> Section, as stated in http://www.gnu.org/manual/emacs-21.2/text/
> emacs.txt.gz ?

Please, let's keep the rhetorical questions to a minimum.

Obviously, the answer to your question is "yes".

Okay, let's *not* keep the rhetorical questions to a minimum.  Why
should Mathieu argue from knowledge when he can argue from ignorance?
:)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     The Rehnquist Court has never
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     encountered a criminal statute it
branden@debian.org                 |     did not like.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- John Dean

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: