Re: Unidentified subject!
Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Friday, Sep 19, 2003, at 19:43 US/Eastern, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
>> I, um, think he meant me, given I *did* say there is a violation of
>> DFSG 2, since binary-only distribution is not permitted.
> Ah! Yeah, that must be what I meant...
> I'm curious: Considering the GPL prohibits binary-only distribution
> under section 3, do you still hold that position?
GPL 3b and 3c deal with that quite nicely. Debian, for example,
distributes its GPL'd software by offering the source on the same