Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>]

Matthieu Roy wrote:
>Does everybody on that list, that thinks that GNU
>political/historical/philosophical/ texts must be DSFG compliant to be
>distributed by Debian, also thinks that the Debian logos must be DFSG 
>compliant?

There's a difference at the moment between "distributed by Debian" and "part 
of Debian", for various reasons.  GNU political/historical/philosophical 
texts must be DFSG compliant to be *in* Debian (main), but can be distributed 
by Debian as part of the non-free archive (unless and until non-free is 
abolished).  Similarly the official Debian logo cannot be in main (and 
isn't), but can be distributed by the Debian organization.

--Nathanael