Re: Unidentified subject!
"Brian W. Carver" <email@example.com> writes:
> Anthony DeRobertis writes:
>> I understand that; in fact, I was one of the many people who pointed out
>> that problem. But that's not what Brian said --- he said that there is a
>> violation of DFSG 2 "since it does not permit 'distribution in source
>> code as well as compiled form'." That's what I'd like a clarification
> Actually, if you look at my original message again, I was quoting
> another list member there. I chose to quote him because I wasn't
> sure I understood what he was talking about either! For further
> clarification we may have to go back to the original source. (Sounds
> appropriate given the topic... ;) Brian --
I, um, think he meant me, given I *did* say there is a violation of
DFSG 2, since binary-only distribution is not permitted.