Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise
From: Fedor Zuev <Fedor_zuev@mail.ru>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 03:32:36 +0900 (IRKST)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.53F.0309200329470.924@bearloga.home>
In-reply-to: <33ccc8319fc27d4ca2748485e09e41a1@Bouncing>
References: <33ccc8319fc27d4ca2748485e09e41a1@Bouncing>

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, MJ Ray wrote:

>licence according to FSD.  Note that freedom for certain modified
>versions (for example, even a work containing only the GNU Manifesto
>invariant section) are effectively blocked, which triggers this
>section of reasoning.

	Do you really believe in this nonsense? Or you just want to
make a random accusation?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

References:
- Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Should the Debian Open Use Logo License be removed from main
Next by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Previous by thread: Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise
Next by thread: Re: "Robinson, Nerode and other free beer zealots" was: A possible GFDL compromise
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread