Re: A possible GFDL compromise
* Jeremy Hankins (email@example.com) [030915 18:50]:
> I'm fairly convinced (despite the lack of info from the FSF on the
> subject) that the only real deal-breaker in the GFDL is the invariant
> sections bit. I think the rest (i.e., the DRM restrictions and even
> the unwieldy opaque/clear distinction) could be worked out.
Yes. But even with this one show stopper I would welcome it if the FSF
is fixing the bugs. Because at the end it would make their license
better (even if we can't include the manuals in debian then).
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C