[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A WDL.

I don't understand...

Why go through all the trouble of writing a WDL?  Why not stick with
using normal software licenses (GPL, LGPL, X11, BSD-3clauses,...) for
documentation?  Anyway, the presence of invariant/opiniated/whatever
non-free parts in the body of the *licensed-work* will hardly ever meet
the requirement of the DFSG, unless the DFSG is amended.

Just a thought.


Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D.             http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM:                                       http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC:                                       http://www.sablecc.org/

Reply to: