[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A WDL.



On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:16:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:23:23PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Thoughts on WDL:
> > 
> > Is "opiniated" really a word or a smelling pistake?  There's probably 
> > some better name.
> 
> Agreed, but "opiniated" was the best I could come up with. In any case,
> since it can be modified, "invariant" surely is a bad name.
> 
> It's been brought to my attention, however, that 'opiniated' is a
> strange construct in the English language, and that 'opinionated' would
> be better. I'm not a native English speaker; I'll leave that to the
> experts. What's important is the definition, not the wording, so if
> someone comes up with a word that better defines what these sections do,
> I'll happily use that word.

"Irrelevant"

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgpbiAe8CG3EY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: