Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> You have missed the point here, so I'll repeat it.
>
> I didn't miss the point--I had not even seen it. The point you say I
> "missed" was in a message that had not even arrived on my machine when
> I wrote those words. I was responding to various points that I recall
> having seen others make.
Well, I have mentioned it many times before.
> It takes up to 48 hours for me to respond to a message, even if I
> write the response as soon as I see it. But sometimes I am even
> further behind and don't answer all of one day's messages until the
> next day. And if I want to put some thought into the response, it may
> be delayed more. To berate and lecture me because you have not
> received a response in two days is a cheap shot that illustrates your
> general attitude.
I was referring to your having missed the point in the very message to
which you were replying. Please stay away from the personal
accusations; they don't help the discussion.
Reply to: