[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy

On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 06:40:53PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> Given that you were misinformed about the FSF's intentions [1] [...]
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg01323.html

I try to be very careful about what I write. The intentions weren't
the FSF's, and they certainly weren't Stallman's; they were that of
"some members of the FSF".

I realise -legal has entered into "Let's rant and rave and be as
uncooperative as possible" mode, which might make the above somewhat
pointless, but hey, it's a free country, right?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

       ``Is this some kind of psych test?
                      Am I getting paid for this?''

Attachment: pgpy6djVuaoUN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: