[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is the OSL DFSG free?



* Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> [2003-09-02 18:46]:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:02:50PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>>  Isn't Section 10 of the OSL ("Mutual Termination for Patent Action") a
>> violation of Section 5 of the DFSG ("No Discrimination Against Persons
>> or Groups")?  It clearly discriminates persons filing a law suite
>> against a OSL licensed software.
> 
> This sort of rationale is usually bogus.
> 
> In its ultimate form, the MIT/X11 license is "non-free" because it
> discriminates against people trying to sell the software.

 Thats one of the reason why we put software that is "for non-commercial
use only" into non-free. Your point was?

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
There are many times when you want it to ignore the rest of the string just
like atof() does.  Oddly enough, Perl calls atof().  How convenient.  :-)
             -- Larry Wall in <1991Jun24.231628.14446@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov>

Attachment: pgpPN11CWPH8g.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: