Re: GFDL - status?
Branden Robinson <email@example.com> wrote:
> I like that document. Everyone concerned about the GNU FDL issue should
> read it.
Unfortunately, it makes the error of confusing the word "documentation"
with the word "document," I think. I'm not sure it was ever claimed
that a GFDL document was free, just the documentation contained in it.
It was just that I expected (wanted?) it to be. Consequently, the bit
about copyleft isn't quite right.
Otherwise, it would be a good summary.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Thought: "Changeset algebra is really difficult."