Re: GFDL - status?
>On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:17:55PM -0000, MJ Ray wrote:
>> Mark Rafn <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > This reminded me to ask: I haven't seen anything recently on the
>> > what to do about GFDLed Debian packages. What's the current state
>> > this discussion?
>> I think Branden published a proposed summary, which provoked some
>Er, I think actually that Anthony Towns is the person who did that.
>> I believe we are waiting for a revised draft of that, or further
>> explanation from FSF. To me, discussing it further before one or the
>> other of the above appears seems to be redundant.
>We should probably go ahead with another draft of that document, yes.
Right, so is anyone doing that?
Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
Why not to use the GNU FDL: