Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> This isn't inconsistent--consistency does not make sense here. We all
> accept various inconveniences to achieve our ends, while rejecting
> others as not worth while. And each decision depends on the magnitude
> of the costs and benefits. To choose the same option in all such
> decisions would be irrational.
Here you are arguing that the inconveniences are minor.
Have you simply ignored the explanations of specific technical things,
reasonable to accomplish (like doc strings) which the GFDL impedes or
makes impossible?
Reply to: