[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GDB manual



Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>     Unfortunately, other people purporting to act on behalf of the FSF do.  
> 
> Did they really claim to be speaking for the FSF, or were they just
> expressing support for the FSF?  Anyone can do the latter, but we did
> not ask anyone to speak for the FSF about this issue on this list.
> 
>     (Meanwhile, messages regarding the perceived problems have generally 
>     been ignored outright.  Even messages asking for clarification: "It 
>     looks to me like the FDL prohibits this.
> 
> Depending on where and how you sent them, that might or might not
> indicate a problem.  licensing@gnu.org is the standard place for
> inquiries.  If questions sent there did not get answered, please show
> me the unanswered message so I can investigate what went wrong.  I
> will try to make sure it does not happen again.

What about the entire set of comments on the draft version of the
GFDL? [1] There was never a response to any of those comments.

Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu

[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2-comments.txt



Reply to: