Re: The debate on invariant sections (long)
En réponse à Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>:
> Emacs is a perfect example. The documentation can be integrated into
> emacs as context-sensitive help. We cannot then distinguish. Since
> pretty much all documentation *could* have this integration done, we
> can't usefully distinguish at all.
>
> (In fact, the GFDL licence for the Emacs manual may make integrating it
>
> as context-sensitive help into the GPLed Emacs legally impossible.
> Ugh.)
Does removing the manual from the tarball suffice?
> <snip>
> > For
> instance, does the GNU manifesto as invariant section hurt?
>
> I say yes. I don't want to have to put it into my (hypothetical)
> context-sensitive help file for emacs, which consists of extracts from
Sure. I understand.
--
Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
<jerome.marant@free.fr>
http://marant.org
Reply to: