[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The debate on invariant sections (long)

En réponse à Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>:

> Emacs is a perfect example.  The documentation can be integrated into 
> emacs as context-sensitive help.  We cannot then distinguish.  Since 
> pretty much all documentation *could* have this integration done, we 
> can't usefully distinguish at all.
> (In fact, the GFDL licence for the Emacs manual may make integrating it
> as context-sensitive help into the GPLed Emacs legally impossible.  
> Ugh.)

Does removing the manual from the tarball suffice?

> <snip>
> >  For 
> instance, does the GNU manifesto as invariant section hurt?
> I say yes.  I don't want to have to put it into my (hypothetical)
> context-sensitive help file for emacs, which consists of extracts from

Sure. I understand.

Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>


Reply to: