[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible problem for debian was [NTP considered basic] misc@openbsd.org

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:08:25PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote:
> > I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist.
> > Does this in any way afflict debian?
>    This subject has already been discussed forever on debian-legal. The
> general consensus is that "without fee" does not mean "you may redistri-
> bute as long as it is without a fee" but rather "the rights are granted
> to you without having to pay a fee to the author".
>    See for instance:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/debian-legal-199908/msg00049.html
>    Or search the -legal archives for "without a fee".

Yup.  As with the Pine license, this wording is not a problem unless the
copyright holder makes it one.

Still, it might be worth contacting the upstream authors to get a
new license statement with the 5-word edit that Henning Makholm proposed
in the message cited above.

G. Branden Robinson                |    Optimists believe we live in the
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    best of all possible worlds.
branden@debian.org                 |    Pessimists are afraid the optimists
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    are right about that.

Attachment: pgplvsrGVcBge.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: